Nobris uses explainable, policy-aware analysis to support research-security review, producing clear findings, required follow-ups, and audit-ready documentation.
Supports review across sensitive technology areas, external affiliations, disclosure requirements, and denied-party screening.
Explainable intelligence for fair, consistent research-security review.
Proposal Review Summary
───────────────────────
✔ Technology sensitivity identified: Quantum Information Science
⚠ Affiliation signal identified: undeclared research collaboration
ℹ Disclosure inconsistency: prior funding not listed
Policy Context
──────────────
- Critical technology area identified
- External affiliation requires review
Recommended Follow-Up
─────────────────────
→ Request disclosure clarification
→ Refer for targeted institutional review
Research security expectations keep rising. Review teams are stretched, policies evolve, and turnaround times shrink.
Manual screening is slow, inconsistent, and difficult to defend under audit.
The result: delayed decisions, uneven risk calls, and avoidable compliance exposure.
Nobris unifies intake, policy-aware analysis, and defensible reporting for research security.
It analyzes proposals for research-security concerns related to technology sensitivity, external affiliations, and disclosure completeness—then explains why they matter and what follow-up may be appropriate.
Nobris supports early-stage research-security review and documentation, integrating into existing institutional review and compliance processes.
Purpose-built for teams managing research-security risk across proposals and collaborations.
Designed to support consistent, explainable research-security review across proposals, collaborators, and disclosures.
Evaluates research materials against applicable research-security requirements to support consistent, policy-aligned review.
Identifies potential inconsistencies between declared affiliations and associated digital or organizational identifiers.
Highlights research areas that may warrant additional scrutiny based on sensitivity or strategic relevance.
Surfaces potential disclosure gaps or inconsistencies for reviewer follow-up, while leaving determinations to institutional processes.
Outlines appropriate next steps to help reviewers document, escalate, or resolve identified issues.
Produces clear, standardized records that capture what was reviewed, what was found, and how decisions were supported.
Upload proposals and supporting files.
Nobris analyzes materials against policies, disclosures, identifiers, and affiliations.
Review a concise assessment with recommended actions.
Nobris keeps reviewers in the loop with explainable findings tied to policy references. Every case captures what was checked, what was found, and the rationale for next steps.
Contact us to schedule a demo and discuss deployment options.
Email info@nobris.dev